Performative Teaching: Facilitation Skills Masterclass

15 hours of workshops
Date: Saturday 29th July and Sunday 30th July 2023

REGISTER HERE

The weekend masterclass develops facilitation skills and is aimed at anyone who is involved in training, development and educating others.

Facilitation skills are vital in any event that involves creating a safe space for collaboration where people are interacting and discussing ideas to promote change.


The workshops explore the use of participatory approaches to professional development such as team building, gaining participants’ trust, maximizing engagement and fostering collaboration and personal disclosure.

The workshops are based on the premise that facilitation skills requires ‘presence’ and involves managing the physical, mental and emotional engagement of the participants.

The workshops also explore the use of community forums in personal and professional development. The workshops are adapted from techniques used in Forum Theatre devised by the Brazilian dramatist Augusto Boal.

Participants will learn the methodology and practice the techniques so after the programme they can apply these methods in their own contexts. 
This methodology provides an innovative framework for conducting professional development in institutions. It is participant centered and the issues are real concerns and challenges that participants face, while providing a safe space to frame the reflections and discussions. The methodology generates multi-voiced, multi-perspectival dialogue and is focused on finding solutions to real problems and inspiring action and change.

REGISTER NOW

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A DAY OF DRAMA AT ITI.

Saturday 25th February 2023

14.00 SPEECH BUBBLES AUDITIONS

We are looking for actors, singers, dancers and a production team for our SUMMER SHOW.

Come to an open audition at ITI on Saturday 25th February 2023 at 14.00pm

If you are interested in being a member of Speech Bubbles and want to be involved in our shows – come along and meet us for information.

Register on our web site: www.speechbubbles.org

15.00 VOICE WORKSHOP

Led by Daniel Foley, a professional actor, who has performed in 64 countries worldwide; his one-man shows have received critical acclaim and he is the founding member of his current theatre company “Performance Exchange.” The workshop includes techniques used by professional actors to project, modulate and develop their voice.

Register here

17.30 PERFORMANCE OF ‘SHAKESPEARE FOR DUMMIES

Tickets 100 TL at the door or..

Buy a ticket by credit card here

Reserve a ticket here

Daniel Foley is a well-known Shakespearean specialist. His one man show brings alive all areas of Shakespearean Drama, from the tragic and macabre to the comic and historic with scenes from “Romeo and Juliet”, “Macbeth”, “Hamlet”, “The Tempest”, amongst others, with significant aplomb and participation of members of the audience. Highlights include impersonations of Marlon Brando and John Wayne taking on Shakespearean roles and an insight into some of the techniques used in hand and sword fighting on the stage. Daniel also shares his knowledge of Elizabethan theatre and tests the audience’s knowledge through an interactive quiz.

Posted in Speech Bubbles | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Community Forums:Towards a Participatory Methodology for Teacher Professional Development.

Developing Facilitation Skills for Trainers and Educators

Face to face courses at ITI Istanbul.

The course develops advanced facilitation skills and is aimed at anyone who is involved in training, development and educating others. Facilitation skills are vital in any event that involves creating a safe space for collaboration where people are interacting and discussing ideas to promote change.
The workshops explore the use of participatory approaches to professional development such as team building, gaining participants’ trust, maximizing engagement and fostering collaboration and personal disclosure and simultaneously develops a range of many other performative skills.
The workshops are structured on tried and proven methodology adapted from the participatory arts and used for training in community settings, care homes, hospitals and many institutions focusing on personal and professional development.

Participants will receive a certificate at the end of the course.

Video link: https://youtu.be/H8 ouEilhE

Link to register

These series of workshops explore the use of community forums in personal and professional development. The workshops are adapted from techniques used in Forum Theatre devised by the Brazilian dramatist Augusto Boal.

Participants will learn the methodology and practice the techniques so after the programme they can apply these methods in their own contexts. 
This methodology provides an innovative framework for conducting professional development in institutions. It is participant (or company) centered (the issues are real concerns and challenges), while providing a safe space to frame the reflections and discussions. The methodology generates multi-voiced, multi-perspectival dialogue and is focused on finding solutions to real problems and inspiring action and change.

Video link: https://youtu.be/CJnw0gR5TTk

Link to register

This paper is based on a series of diagnostic workshops conducted at a teacher training centre in Istanbul focusing on how participatory methodology can inform ELT Teacher Education. The workshops provided participants experience of participatory methodology and techniques to elicit feedback on their pedagogic value and efficacy in Teacher Education. Through dialogue and reflection, participants identify the facilitation skills they value from the workshops. While participatory methodology has a long and proven track record in Applied Theatre, education and development, it is rarely utilized in teacher development programmes. In particular we explored the use of Community Forums (an adaption of Forum Theatre) in which participants re-enact collectively experienced challenges in order to find solutions. Feedback from the workshops reveals that Community Forums provide participant-led, solution-oriented, multiple voiced opportunities for reflection and dialogue on critical incidents teachers’ face. Additionally, the workshops aim to initiate transformational change by developing participants’ facilitation skills. The research provides the initial diagnostic data to create teacher development programmes incorporating Community Forums and participatory methods.

1      Introduction.

Having just attended a series of professional workshops I am struck by a worrying paradox. Most ELT trainers and educators, while advocating lessons that are personalised, learner-centred and focus on communication and language use; in practice deliver training sessions that are tutor-centred, material driven (invariably structured by power point slides) that appear to aim primarily at the transmission of content. If trainers and educators do not set an example of how to encourage participatory learning, it is hardly surprising then that teachers often pay lip service to the concept of ‘facilitating learning’ while in reality they are stuck in the traditional conception of a teacher as a transmitter of information. We sorely need a framework and structured methodology for participant-led, solution-oriented professional development workshops.

One solution may lie in the methodology provided by the participatory arts. Participatory arts provide a form of expression which enables shared ownership of decision-making processes and aims to generate dialogue, reflection, and community cohesion. Adapting the principles and rationale of Forum Theatre I explored the use of participatory methodology (and Commubnity Forums in particular) for teacher professional development in a series of workshops at a teacher training centre in Istanbul. Community Forums are an adaptation of Forum Theatre which was developed by the Brazilian educator, dramatist, director Augusto Boal in 1973. Rooted in the Brazilian social movements of the 1950s and 1960s and based on Paolo Freire’s model of participatory education, it is designed to represent experiences of social and political oppression in order to stimulate community dialogue and problem-solving. Over 50 years later Forum Theatre has been shown to work successfully across a remarkable range of cultural, political, and social differences and demands. It has been used by peasants and workers, students and teachers, artists, social workers, psychotherapists, and NGOs, among others; in schools, streets, churches, hospitals, theatres, and prisons.

2      Methodology

Community Forums can be seen as a methodology for generating both the participants’ understanding of their situation and the actions to improve them so, in other words, it provides both the content (problems) and the methods to interrogate reflection and elicit solutions. The procedure is relatively straight forward and easy for a novice facilitator to follow after basic training. Participants (teachers in our case) are invited to brainstorm and recall crtiical incidents from their experience of challenges / problems they have faced in their work and then share experiences with each other prior to re-enacting the scenarios in groups in order to reflect and diagnose solutions and alternative courses of action. Having investigated and rehearsed a number of scenarios, these then can be scaled up to a wider community by presenting them to an audience and inviting them to discuss and offer alternative solutions. The workshops aim at the education, personal growth and skills development of the participants as well as providing a diagnostic exploration of the efficacy of applying community forums in a professional development setting.

3      Objectives

My specific objectives for the workshops are fourfold.

1.         Diagnostic: To provide an opportunity to experience community forums and to elicit participant-led feedback on their efficacy for teacher education.

2.         Methodologic: Related to the above, to evaluate whether the methodology is appropriate and effective in teacher education settings (does it do what it claims to do).

3.         Pedagogic: To elicit through dialogue and reflection what participants have learned from the workshops.

4.         Transformational: To initiate action or change by providing opportunities to develop facilitation skills for participants to utilize in their own settings.

4      Procedure

The workshops were structured according to two components:

A.) Games and participatory activities and B). Community Forum interrogating the challenges of being an ELT teacher and eliciting creative solutions

A.         Games and participatory activities.

The activities are designed to build and/or develop most, if not all, of the following:

  • Trust
  • Spontaneity and creativity
  • Collaboration
  • Listening and awareness
  • Communication
  • Effective interaction
  • Confidence and Capacity
  • Information and education
  • Problem-solving
  • Incitement to change vs catharsis
  • Community development

Film footage and demonstrations of the activities can be viewed from this link: https://youtu.be/H8VoyPEilhE

B. Community Forum methodology.

The workshop structure relies on participation. Firstly, the workshops are built on the participants’ personal narratives and experiences. Sharing personal stories can be a powerful way of promoting teacher development through the sharing of experiences (McCabe 2002). Secondly it is inherently educational as the reflective and interactive processes promote self-aware, critically thinking participants. It encourages a ‘bottom up’ approach to change that is advocated in much literature on educational innovation and change (Fullan 2007).

How the Community Forum was set up can be viewed on this link: https://youtu.be/CJnw0gR5TTk)

The three (3 hour) workshops followed this format.

Workshop 1. Tilling the Soil.

Participants warm up to the concept of self-disclosure through activities in pairs and groups. Then we brainstorm the rewards of teaching before relating a story of positive achievement in groups which provides the stimulus for re-enacting the story through image theatre. In the final hour we repeated the cycle but this time brainstorming – challenges, obstacles, difficulties, and concerns of an ELT teacher.

Workshop 2.  ‘Sowing the Seeds’

Participants focus on devising scenes for the community forum scenario. By the end of the workshop we have six scenes and a facilitator/ director allocated to each scene.

Stage 3 ‘Blooming’

Participants focus on developing facilitation skills and rehearsing the forum scenes. The scenarios are pressented to an audience in the Community Forum. The forum aims to stimulate discussion, reflection and debate amongst the audience who are also invited to participate in the search for solutions to the issues raised.

5      Findings and participant feedback

5.1      Real experiences / challenges

The aim of the community forum was to raise awareness and interrogate the challenges that teachers face and to explore solutions. After the first workshop I categorized these challenges into four groups for ease of reference:

1.         Internal challenges (self-doubts, moods, energy levels, lack of confidence / knowledge)

2.         External challenges (from administration, management, learners, parents and colleagues)

3.         Contextual challenges (low pay, large classes, inappropriate methodology and materials)

4.         Cultural challenges (poor communication, long hours, cultural differences)

When planning the workshops, I was concerned that the scenarios presented to the audience would lack authenticity. However, these comments suggest otherwise:

‘It shows the challenges of a teacher. It is nice to know you are not alone experiencing these kind of problems’

‘It mirrors real situations and presents them visually’.

Indeed, one audience member embodied the experience:

‘In the beginning I was so tense and I felt I was exactly the same as Asya (the protagonist), I even felt blank in the first 10 seconds after the show was over. Felt frustrated but then I started thinking how I could help her… things changed. I started to feel more confident. I could think outside the box again. I felt relieved.’

At the end of the second workshop one participant recognized that time and iteration are necessary for depth and wrote: ‘I believe this kind of training will be more ‘fruitful’ if done several times. I mean problems to focus on will get more challenging and therefore the issues raised will be more thought provoking.’

5.2        Metaxis / dramatic distance.

Participants noted that re-enacting the fiction provided space for reflection. Boal (1995, p.43) refers to the term metaxis to describe the idea of living in an imaginary world which creates a dialectic between fiction and reality so knowledge acquired in the fictional world is transferable to the real world through imaginative play.  The benefits of drama to provide ‘distance’ was mentioned by participants as in these examples: ‘I think they open some doors and give perspective about real life problems. Watching other people and seeing the problems acted provides a distance from the problem. So I can think better to find a solution.’

When dramatizing critical incidents participants experience a condition of in-between-ness, a liminal space between reality and fiction. This duality creates both tension and imaginative possibilities that are crucial elements in a training context. Through imagining what it might be like to be another, at the same time as being themselves, participants experience ‘me/not me’ (Schechner, 1985). Transformative theories of learning (Mezirow, 1997) propose that learning occurs when the participant faces a challenge, either an accumulation of experiences over time or a sudden trauma. The state of disequilibrium triggers reflection and critical assessment.

5.3      Reflection and Dialogue.

When prompted to consider the benefits for professional development two comments from the audience included:

‘Confidence, talking about the issues via fictional characters makes people feel better (a bit of therapy) becoming more aware of what happens in their schools’.

‘Imagined situations may be perceived as less confrontational’

Each scenario in our performance highlighted problematic issues involving our teacher protagonist facing challenges. At the end of the event, we had a feedback discussion in which the audience reflected on the experience.

5.4      Participant-led.

By delegating content creation to the workshop participants, the conventional power discrepancy is overturned allowing for participant centred input. This flexibility in facilitation allows for creation of a zone of proximal development for the participants and shifts the responsibility for learning from the facilitator to the participants (Vygotsky, 1986). The zone of proximal development is a concept introduced by Vygotsky to describe the space between ‘not able to do’ and ‘able to do’. In this space participants seek solutions with support from the audience.

One key objective of the workshops is to assess their pedagogic value. One factor that emerged was that as the content was participant led, this allowed space for creativity. One participant commented: ‘It was lovely watching the things that were crafted by people, from nothing‘.

5.5      Change and transformation

A key aspect of the methodology is the degree of change and transformation of the participants. In the final workshop I invited participants to comment on how the workshops assisted in their professional development. Many comments referred to the methodology itself; ‘Creating alternative solutions, scenarios, paths of experience’; ‘Exploring issues that concern teachers can clarify things and help find solutions;’ Many participants commented on the relationship between challenge and enjoyment: ‘It was scary at first, but then, it was fun’. In terms of learning and development there is a need for challenge, as Sawyer (1999) highlights: ‘Change is always connected to the willingness to take risks in going beyond what is known and familiar’.

5.6      Scalability

One key advantage of community forums in terms of teacher development is that the procedure can be scaled up to involve large numbers of participants in a short time period. Simply by training an initial modest cohort of 12 community forum facilitators, if these facilitators subsequently conduct workshops for a further 12 participants and then present their community forums to audiences of 200 teachers, within a limited period more than 2,500 teachers will have been exposed to the issues and had an opportunity to discuss and generate solutions. The forums can be expanded to include other stakeholders such as School Principals, learners, and parents. In addition the impact of the forums in terms of audience responses and committment to finding solutions is visible. The forum can be filmed and/ or audience feedback obtained to provide tangible evidence of impact to sponsors.

5.7      Limitations

One audience member recognised that a representative range of stakeholders are needed to have a genuine interrogation of the issues: ‘Through these workshops we can actually educate heads of department, principals of schools, managers and even teacher trainers in order to create a healthier working environment.’

When asked whether institutions would be interested in professional development using Community Forums there was a mixed response. ‘The institutions are interested in making money. I think they don’t care for using professional development that needs a lot of time and costs a lot maybe’.

‘Here is the point, sometimes people prefer the old-fashioned techniques (books, homework and old rules) so they are not accepting new things.’

6      Conclusion

Community Forums operate at the facilitative, open end of the teaching / training continuum and therefore are liable to elicit more fervent participant responses, interaction and dialogue. Community Forums epitomise an interactionist, participatory approach to learning espousing the philosophy that the process of meaningful dialogue and interaction and the flow of ideas is where learning occurs.

We can conclude by revisiting our initial objectives for the workshops.

1.         Diagnostic.

The workshops generated reflection and discussion that provided valuable information about participants perspectives of Community Forums and its relevance to their development as teachers.

2.         Methodology.

Despite some limitations, such as potential lack of acceptance by institutions and other stakeholders, we can conclude that Community Forums provide participant-led, authentic content to generate solution oriented interventions, reflection, and dialogue of lived experience as well as offering a safe, fictional distance to encourage personal disclosure and multiple perspectives.

3.         Pedagogic

Participants identified numerous facilitation skills that emerged primarily through the games and activities. The methodology provides participants opportunities to develop facilitation skills of raising their awareness of self, others and reflect on their beliefs, behaviour and feelings. These facilitation skills are rarely addressed in teacher education where the focus is primarily on a cognitive, instrumental orientation rather than towards a performative-humanistic understanding of “teaching and learning with head, heart, hands, and feet” (Schewe, 2013, p. 7).

4.         Transformational

My aim in conducting the workshops is to stimulate action and change. The workshops are a pilot project to explore the efficacy of Community Forums and how to develop the skills of facilitators who can  then disseminate the methodology. After my initial diagnostic workshops I have created two short courses: 1) A week intensive training to develop facilitator skills; 2) Three (3 hour) workshops leading to a Community Forum (see Appendix  A). The overall aim is to introduce teachers to a range of techniques to raise awareness of the participatory arts in general and the us of community forums in particular and  reveal a fresh landscape of creative personalised expression, enjoyment and gratification.

Works Cited

Boal, A., 1995. The rainbow of desire: the Boal method of theatre and therapy. Routledge, London; New York.

Freire, P., 1995. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum, New York.

Fullan, M., 2007. The new meaning of educational change, 4th ed. ed. Teachers College Press, New York.

Mezirow, J., 1997. Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing , Volume 1997, pp. 5 – 12.

McCabe, A., 2002. A Wellspring for development. IATEFL Publications 82–96.

Sawyer, R.K., 2004. Creative Teaching: Collaborative Discussion as Disciplined Improvisation. Educational Researcher 33, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002012

Schechner, R., 1985. Between theatre and anthropology. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Schewe, M., 2013. Taking stock and looking ahead: Drama pedagogy as a gateway for performative. Scenario: Journal for Performative Teaching, Learning and Research, Volume 8, pp. 5 – 23.

Vygotsky, L., 1986. Thought and language. Cambridge, Massachucetts: MIT.

7. Appendix

Developing Facilitation Skills for Trainers and Educators

Face to face course at ITI Istanbul.

Video link: https://youtu.be/H8 ouEilhE

These series of workshops explore the use of community forums in personal and professional development. The workshops are adapted from techniques used in Forum Theatre devised by the Brazilian dramatist Augusto Boal.

Participants will learn the methodology and practice the techniques so after the programme they can apply these methods in their own contexts. 
This methodology provides an innovative framework for conducting professional development in institutions. It is participant (or company) centered (the issues are real concerns and challenges), while providing a safe space to frame the reflections and discussions. The methodology generates multi-voiced, multi-perspectival dialogue and is focused on finding solutions to real problems and inspiring action and change.

Video link: https://youtu.be/CJnw0gR5TTk

Link to register

Posted in Whole Person Learning | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

PERFORMATIVE PEDAGOGY AND TEACHER EDUCATION.

Identifying Performative and Meta-Performative Skills pertinent to Teacher Development.

This article is based on a series of diagnostic workshops conducted at a teacher training centre in Istanbul focusing on how Performative Pedagogy can inform Teacher Education. Performative Pedagogy provides embodied, participant-led, solution-oriented, multiple voiced opportunities for reflection and dialogue on critical incidents teachers’ face. In addition, participants highlighted a number of performative skills pertaining to developing awareness of self, others and setting that are fundamentally ignored in current competence-based teacher education programmes. Finally participants uncovered meta-performative skills revealing aspects of their identity and reflection on why teachers act in the way that they do.

Background to the workshops

I work in a teacher training centre in Istanbul training pre-service and in-service teachers from a spectrum of cultures and linguistic backgrounds. The environment demands self-aware, reflective teachers who are collaborative, demonstrate inter and intra-personal qualities, adaptable, able to embrace diversity in multi-cultural and multi-linguistic contexts while solving emergent problems, adopting a range of roles and in most cases having to perform in a language which is not their mother tongue. Typically, the teacher education they receive focusses on cognitive, instrumental and propositional knowledge leaving them often feeling ill-equipped, disillusioned and ill-prepared to meet the behavioral challenges of teaching a class in situ. To fill this gap, I have turned to performative pedagogy and to an examination of its applicability to teacher education.

Performative approaches to learning demands skills that combine physical, cognitive and affective domains. Teaching is performative in that it is based on judgements formed through action (heuristic); it is influenced by contingencies that happen in real time and are unpredictable (improvised); it involves physical and emotional engagement (embodied) and learning is created in the process (emergent).  “Teachers are taught how to instruct but not how to engage their students emotionally”. (Wahl, 2011, p. 21).

Post pandemic it is opportune to consider the importance of the embodied physical presence of learners and teachers in the learning encounter as this raises fundamental issues as to the nature of teaching and learning. Teachers are rarely trained in skills to assist them to be physically present, emotionally aware and able to improvise creatively to emergent needs. The potential of embodied methodologies and the need to acquire performative skills is ignored in teacher education which remains firmly entrenched in a competence driven paradigm. Metaphorically teacher education provides ‘the map’ (the official version of the journey route) but omits ‘the story’ (the feelings of the journey’s experience).

Research on teacher education has moved somewhat from defining what a teacher is, does or believes to a more ‘bottom up’ perspective of examining how teachers learn (Allwright 2001). Despite a move to more teacher introspection, teacher education is still rooted to the assumption that teachers need core disciplinary knowledge (Yates and Muchisky 2003) and knowledge of pedagogic skills which will be moulded into expertise through classroom experience. In contrast the underlying philosophy behind performative pedagogy is that there is a direct relationship between affective, cognitive and physical domains so we need to ‘feel’ something as well as understand it. Vygotsky refers to ‘perezvanhie’ a Russian term meaning ‘learning through experience’. In other words, we need to experience the state of confusion (liminality), a state of being in limbo between knowing and not knowing, before transformation is possible. Development is conceptualized as participatory, action oriented, holistic and requires a performative-humanistic understanding of ‘teaching and learning with head, heart, hands and feet’ (Schewe, 2013).

Definition of Performative.

The term ‘performative’ was first coined by Austin in 1962 to refer to a limited set of verbs that both describe and require the performance of the act simultaneously: ‘I name this ship Titanic’. The term was picked up 20 years later by Postmodern thinkers (Derrida, Habermas, Bourdieu) who re-defined ‘performativity’ to include any iterative action that involves social interaction and presence (embodied), indeed any action that involves people coming together to communicate meanings and affirm cultural and social values (i.e. protest marches, sports events, political rallies, concerts). Today with the advent of Performance Studies performativity has a wide remit encompassing gender, race and has opened up significant ways for rethinking language and identity.

Features of Performative Pedagogy.

Performance pedagogy has evolved from ‘drama in education’ (pioneered by Heathcote in the 1960s) and is inherently participant centred. The key characteristics are role playing, improvisation, context specific topics and reflection and discussion on the part of the participants. Like Heathcote, the dramatist Augusto Boal’s philosophy (as depicted in his book ‘Theatre of the Oppressed’) involves learning through re-enactment of scenarios but differs in that learning starts with an awareness and analysis of the present context (oppressions) and involves re-enactment and reflection to uncover solutions and promote action/ change. Boal’s methodology is indebted to his mentor the pedagogue Freire who foregrounds the movement of powerless (oppressed) people from being acted upon (objects) to initiating action and becoming subjects of their own lives. For Freire this process of ‘conscientization’ is dependent on replacing the banking system of education (filling learners with the academy’s version of knowledge) with a dialogic approach to learning.  So, while Freire broke the hierarchical divide between teacher and student, Boal did so between performer and audience and by extension performative pedagogy conducts a similar dismantling of the positioning of Teacher and Teacher Educator.

The Findings

These workshops, by identifying the performative and meta-performative skills required by teachers contributes to both the participants’ personal development as well as informing Teacher Education in general. No doubt that becoming more aware of who you are and where you are going is key to professional development. Teachers share experiences and commonalities, become more comfortable with personal disclosure, and come to experience and enjoy a new level of articulation and self-efficacy.

Workshop Objectives

1.         Diagnostic.

The workshops generated a lot of written data, oral reflection and discussion that provided valuable information about participants perspectives of Performative Pedagogy and how it is relevant to their development as teachers.

2.         Methodology.

Performative Pedagogy provides participant-led, authentic content to generate solution oriented, embodied interventions, reflection, and dialogue of lived experience as well as offering a safe dramatic, fictional distance to encourage personal disclosure and multiple perspectives.

3.         Pedagogic

Participants identified numerous performative and meta-performative skills that emerged primarily through the workshop activities. The methodology provides participants opportunities to develop performative skills of raising their awareness of self, others and their context and reflect on their beliefs, behaviour and feelings while performing the activities (meta-performative).

4.         Transformational

There is a need for training in performative methods and for educational practices to understand the potential of the arts in transforming consciousness, refining the senses, and enlarging the imagination, and requiring teachers with awareness of performative skills. Performative Pedagogy introduces teachers to a range of techniques to raise awareness of the performative and reveal a fresh landscape of creative embodied expression, enjoyment and gratification.

References

Allwright, R, 2001. Three major processes of teacher development and the appropriate design criteria for developing and using them, in: Research and Practice in Language Teacher Education: Voices from the Field. CARLA, Minneapolis, pp. 115–134.

Schewe, M., 2013. Taking Stock and Looking Ahead: Drama Pedagogy as a Gateway to a Performative Teaching and Learning Culture. Scenario 2013.

Yates, R., Muchisky, D., 2003. On Reconceptualizing Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly 37, 135.

Wahl, S., 2011. Learning to teach by treading the boards. In Key Concepts in Theatre/Drama Education (pp. 19-22).

Posted in Teacher Development, Whole Person Learning | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hello world!

 

Welcome to Teacher Talking Time.

This is a blog for teachers interested in teacher education, teacher training and development, teaching and learning and related topics. We will be inviting a variety of  people to share their experiences on a regular basis – so keep coming back!.

The latest post is by Galina an ITI DELTA student working in Samara, Russia. She describes the three-day ITI Master Classes held at her University. Liz and I had a wonderful time and thank Galina for inviting us and also writing it up for our blog. 

I have written the first two posts to get the ball rolling. My first post is about ‘whole person learning’ and explains my personal philosophy that learning should utilise the whole person in terms of stimulating the mind, body and emotions.

My second post is also personal and describes my experiences over the last two years facing cancer. Like staring down from a precipice, confronting our fragile mortality is terrifying, and yet, at the same time by confronting the inevitable, it provides a unique opportunity to perceive from a new and sharper perspective and to learn valuable lessons about the nature of learning and life.

I hope you enjoy these postings and future ones.

Best wishes

Tom Godfrey (Director of ITI)

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Teaching Is Taking People on Journeys: A simple storytelling exercise that reminds teachers what learning really feels like.

The 10-Minute Exercise That Turns Strangers into Storytellers

In my Teaching Artistry workshops, I sometimes say something unusual to the group:

“Find a partner.
You’re about to take them on a journey.”

There are no slides.
No handouts.
No theory.

Just imagination.

Within minutes, the room transforms.

People begin walking slowly across the space, describing places that only they can see.

A childhood garden.
A beach they visited years ago.
A street where they once played.

Their partner listens carefully, asking questions, stepping into the imagined world.

What begins as a simple activity quickly becomes something much deeper.


A Tour of an Invisible World

One participant becomes the guide.

The other becomes the guest.

The guide takes their partner on an imaginary tour of a place they know well—somewhere meaningful, often connected with positive memories.

Perhaps:

  • the playground where they spent hours as a child
  • a favourite park or street
  • a family home or back garden

As they speak, the pair move through the room as if they are actually there.

“Over here is the old oak tree.”
“This is where we used to sit.”
“Careful—there’s a small stream just ahead.”

The guest listens, asks questions, and follows.

Not judging.
Not analysing.

Just entering the story.

After ten or fifteen minutes, they swap roles.

Another journey begins.


What Makes This So Powerful

On the surface, this exercise is about imagination and storytelling.

But something else happens too.

Participants start discovering unexpected things about each other:

  • memories that shaped them
  • landscapes connected to joy or belonging
  • details that reveal personality and history

Within half an hour, the group feels different.

Strangers become people with stories.

And the room becomes full of invisible places.


The Skills Beneath the Activity

Exercises like this quietly develop important abilities for teachers:

  • attentive listening
  • clear communication
  • improvisation
  • empathy
  • imagination

When guiding the tour, participants must keep the story alive.

They describe spaces, objects, sounds, and feelings.

When listening, they must stay curious and present.

They learn that communication is not just about speaking clearly—it’s about inviting someone into your world.


The Questions That Follow

After the journeys end, we reflect together.

Participants often share surprising insights:

  • What did it feel like to guide someone through your memories?
  • What was it like to follow someone else’s story?
  • Could you clearly picture the places described?
  • What emotions surfaced while telling or hearing the story?

And perhaps the most interesting question:

What made some journeys feel vivid and alive?

The answers almost always involve attention, imagination, and trust.

The same qualities that make great teaching possible.


Why This Matters for Teachers

Teaching is often framed as delivering knowledge.

But much of it is actually about guiding people through experiences.

We invite learners to imagine new possibilities.
To explore unfamiliar ideas.
To step into worlds they cannot yet see.

In many ways, every lesson is a journey.

And teachers are its guides.

Exercises like Take Me on a Journey help educators rediscover this fundamental truth.


This Is the Kind of Work We Explore

In the Performative ELT community, we explore many activities like this—simple, embodied exercises that reveal deeper insights about teaching, communication, and human connection.

They are not just warm-ups.

They are mirrors.

They help teachers reflect on:

  • how they communicate
  • how they listen
  • how they invite others into learning

If that resonates with you, you’re warmly invited to join us.

The community is free, and full of educators exploring creative and performative approaches to teaching.

👉 https://performativeelt.com/free-community-6779

Because sometimes the most powerful professional development doesn’t begin with a lecture.

It begins with a simple invitation:

“Take me somewhere you remember.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Map of the Floor: When Teachers Step Into Their Story

An embodied reflection on identity, presence, and the journeys that shape how we teach.

The Simple Workshop Exercise That Reveals a Teacher’s Journey

In my Teaching Artistry workshops, I sometimes ask teachers to do something unusual.

I tell them to imagine a giant map of the world spread across the floor.

North.
South.
East.
West.

Then I say:

“Place yourself on the map where you were born.”

And suddenly the room begins to move.

People walk slowly across the floor.
Some hesitate.
Some look around for others from nearby places.
Some smile with recognition.

What starts as a simple movement exercise quickly becomes something much deeper.


The Map Appears on the Floor

I explain that where I’m standing might represent one country.

Across the room might be another.

Someone stands in “South America.”
Someone else moves toward “Europe.”
Another drifts quietly toward “Asia.”

There’s always a moment of uncertainty.

“This isn’t a geography test,” I reassure them.

“If you’re not sure where you are, someone will help.”

Gradually, the map fills with people.

Not as teachers.

As stories.


When Geography Becomes Biography

Once everyone is standing somewhere on the map, I ask participants to look around.

Who is near you?

Who grew up close to where you did?

Who travelled the furthest to get here?

Conversations begin.

Participants explain:

  • where they were born
  • where their families come from
  • where they feel most at home

Within minutes, the room changes.

The group is no longer anonymous.

It becomes a community of journeys.


The Question Beneath the Map

After people have shared a little about where they come from, I ask a few reflective questions:

  • How do you feel about the place where you were born?
  • Where do you feel most at home?
  • How has your birthplace influenced your life path?

Sometimes the answers are light.

Sometimes they are surprisingly profound.

Because where we start shapes more than our passport.

It shapes our language, identity, confidence, belonging, and opportunity.


Why This Matters in Teacher Development

On the surface, Map of the Floor is a simple icebreaker.

But in practice, it does something much more powerful.

It invites:

  • personal disclosure
  • empathy
  • curiosity
  • awareness of difference and connection

And it reminds us that every teacher in the room carries a unique journey.

Behind every professional role is a story.

Behind every method is a human being shaped by experience.


When the Map Needs to Change

In some groups, asking about birthplace can feel too sensitive.

If that’s the case, the exercise shifts slightly.

Instead of “Where were you born?”, I ask:

  • Where would you love to visit?
  • Where would you go on your dream holiday?

The map still fills with movement.

The stories still emerge.

And the group still discovers something about itself.


Why Embodied Activities Matter

Teacher development often happens sitting down.

Talking about theory.

Looking at slides.

But teaching itself is embodied.

It happens in space.

Through movement, presence, and relationships.

Exercises like this help participants experience ideas physically, not just intellectually.

They create the conditions for connection, reflection, and participation.


This Is the Kind of Work We Explore

Activities like Map of the Floor are not just warm-ups.

They are windows into identity, experience, and community.

Inside the Performative ELT community, we explore many activities like this — practical, embodied exercises that help teachers reflect on who they are, how they teach, and how they connect with others.

If that resonates with you, you’re warmly invited to join us.

It’s free.

👉 https://performativeelt.com/free-community-6779

Because sometimes the most important professional question isn’t:

“What should I teach today?”

It’s:

“Where am I standing in my journey as a teacher?”

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Are You Chasing?

The Game of Tag That Becomes a Mirror for Teachers

How a simple running game exposes burnout, ambition, and the hidden pressures shaping your teaching.

In my Teaching Artistry workshops, I sometimes begin with a game.

A running game.

Arms linked.
Laughter.
Energy rising.

It looks like something from a primary school playground.

It isn’t.

Within minutes, it becomes a metaphor for life, leadership, and why we became teachers in the first place.


The Game: Cat and Mouse

Participants link arms in pairs, forming a human chain.

One person is the cat (the chaser).
One person is the mouse (the chased).

The cat runs.
The mouse escapes.

The mouse is safe if they hook onto a linked pair.
That releases someone else — who instantly becomes the new mouse.

Chaos.
Speed.
Laughter.
Adrenaline.

And then the shift.


The Question That Changes Everything

After 10–15 minutes, breathless and smiling, I ask:

  • How did it feel to be chased?
  • How did it feel to chase?
  • Which role did you prefer?
  • What thoughts ran through your head?

Then the deeper question:

In your life, are you chasing — or being chased?

The room gets quieter.

Because suddenly it’s not a game anymore.


What It Reveals

This simple activity surfaces powerful dynamics:

  • urgency
  • fear
  • competitiveness
  • avoidance
  • collaboration
  • reliance on others

Some teachers love the thrill of chasing.

Others feel uncomfortable being pursued.

Some desperately look for safety.
Some hesitate to join a pair.

It becomes a live metaphor for:

  • ambition
  • burnout
  • purpose
  • escape
  • belonging

What are you running towards?
What are you running away from?

And how does that relate to why you’re here?


Variations That Deepen the Mirror

We sometimes play Stuck in the Mud.

When tagged, you freeze — legs apart — until someone crawls through to free you.

Suddenly the focus shifts:

Who helps?
Who notices?
Who leaves others stuck?

Or Linked Arms Tag.

When tagged, you link arms with “it.”

The chain grows.

Eventually, everyone is connected.

It stops being about speed.

It becomes about unity.


Why This Matters for Teachers

These are not icebreakers.

They are diagnostics.

They reveal:

  • how we relate to pressure
  • how we respond to being pursued
  • how we support others
  • how we seek safety
  • how we experience competition

Teaching is often described as intellectual work.

But it’s also embodied.

We chase targets.
We feel chased by deadlines.
We look for safety in institutions.
We link arms with colleagues — or we don’t.

Sometimes it takes a “children’s game” to surface what we’re really feeling.


This Is the Kind of Work We Explore

In the Performative ELT community, we explore activities like this — not as entertainment, but as reflection.

We ask:

What does this reveal about who I am as a teacher?
What patterns am I repeating?
Where am I running — and why?

If you’re interested in embodied, experiential approaches to teacher development — the kind that go beyond methodology and into identity — you’re warmly invited to join us.

It’s free.

👉 https://performativeelt.com/free-community-6779

Because sometimes the most important professional question isn’t:

“What should I teach next?”

It’s:

What am I chasing?

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hypnosis And The Exercise That Reveals How You Handle Control

Columbian Hypnosis

(And Why Every Teacher Should Try It)

In my Teaching Artistry workshops, I sometimes tell teachers:

“You’re about to hypnotise each other.”

There’s always a pause.

Then laughter.

Then curiosity.

The activity is called Colombian Hypnosis, developed by Augusto Boal in Games for Actors and Non-Actors.

And in under 10 minutes, it reveals more about trust, control, and teacher identity than many theoretical discussions ever could. Watch a demo here:


What Happens

One participant holds their hand 20–40 cm from their partner’s face.

Palm forward. Fingers upright.

The partner must keep their face the same distance from the hand at all times.

Where the hand moves, the face follows.

Up. Down. Sideways. Diagonal. Slow spirals. Sudden shifts.

The leader must never stop completely.
The follower must never lose alignment.

Very quickly:

  • bodies bend into unusual shapes
  • forgotten muscles wake up
  • laughter mixes with discomfort
  • concentration sharpens

Then they switch.

Leader becomes follower.

Control becomes surrender.

Later, both extend a hand at the same time — becoming leader and follower simultaneously.

And that’s where it gets interesting.


What It’s Really About

On the surface, it’s a movement exercise.

In reality, it’s about:

  • focus and presence
  • spatial awareness
  • non-verbal communication
  • empathy
  • responsibility
  • power

It exposes how we relate to control.

Some participants love leading.

Others feel anxious holding responsibility for someone else’s body.

Some relax when following.

Others resist being directed.

In a few minutes, patterns emerge.


The Questions That Matter

After the movement, I don’t analyse technique.

I ask:

  • Which did you prefer — leading or being led?
  • Why?
  • Was it easy to trust your partner?
  • What helped it work well?
  • What made it difficult?

And then the deeper question:

How does this relate to how we teach?

Because teaching is a constant negotiation of:

  • authority and agency
  • guidance and autonomy
  • control and trust

In classrooms, we lead.
We invite.
We structure.
We respond.

But do we always notice how much control we hold?

Or how much we struggle to release it?


Why This Matters for Teachers

Colombian Hypnosis is not about theatre.

It’s about awareness.

It surfaces:

  • our instinct to dominate or withdraw
  • our comfort with vulnerability
  • our ability to read others non-verbally
  • our tolerance for uncertainty

And it reminds us that facilitation is embodied.

Before it’s a strategy, it’s a stance.

Before it’s a method, it’s a relationship.


This Is the Kind of Work We Explore

Activities like this aren’t icebreakers.

They’re mirrors.

They help teachers reflect on presence, power, empathy, and responsibility — through experience, not lecture.

If this kind of embodied exploration resonates, you’re warmly invited to join our free Performative ELT community.

It’s a space where we share practical activities like this, unpack the theory behind them, and explore what it really means to teach with presence and artistry.

You can join us here:

👉 https://performativeelt.com/free-community-6779

Because sometimes the most important professional question isn’t:

“What method should I use?”

It’s:

When do I lead — and when do I let go?

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Unlocking Teacher Potential: The Owl Transformation

The Owl Transformation

The 10-Minute Activity That Reveals More About Teaching Than a Lecture Ever Could

I often begin my Teaching Artistry workshops with a warning:

“This activity is dangerous.”

Teachers look concerned.

Then I tell them they’re going to transform.

Not sentences.
Not active to passive.
Not direct to reported speech.

Themselves.

Into an owl.

And that’s when the discomfort begins.


Why Ask Adults to Become Owls?

On the surface, it’s a simple concentration and voice exercise (inspired by work from Alan Maley).

But in reality, it’s something much deeper.

The Owl Transformation develops:

  • focus and presence
  • vocal strength
  • spatial awareness
  • group rapport
  • empathy and sensitivity
  • imaginative flexibility

And, perhaps most importantly, it exposes how easily adults lose access to play.


The Setup

Participants stand in a circle.

I describe the owl:

A bird that comes out at night.
Large eyes.
Wise.
Able to turn its head almost all the way around.

Then I say:

“Transformation is straightforward.
The danger comes when transforming back.”

That line always sharpens concentration.


The Transformation

  • Shake your wings (arms).
  • Close the windows (so no one flies off).
  • Place your right hand on your left shoulder.
  • Turn your head to look behind you.
  • Take a deep breath.
  • On “Go”, return slowly to centre.
  • Wide eyes.
  • A strong, focused owl hoot.

There is almost always nervous laughter.

I gently remind them:

“Owls do not laugh.”

We try again.

Concentration deepens.

The room changes.


The Real Work Begins After the Hoot

The transformation isn’t the point.

The reflection is.

I ask:

  • How did you feel?
  • Self-conscious? Resistant? Silly?
  • Did you laugh—or manage to stay focused?
  • What thoughts did you use to control the impulse to laugh?

Something powerful happens here.

Teachers begin to notice their internal dialogue.

Their self-talk.
Their resistance.
Their vulnerability.

And then we ask the bigger question:

Why does something that comes so naturally to children feel uncomfortable for adults?

Children transform constantly.
Soldier. Train driver. Witch. Frog. Princess.

No embarrassment. No irony. No apology.

So what changed?


What This Activity Really Teaches

The Owl Transformation is not about drama.

It’s about:

  • reclaiming imagination
  • managing self-consciousness
  • intervening in unhelpful self-talk
  • strengthening presence under pressure

It reveals how creativity requires concentration, not confidence.

And how professional growth often involves stepping through mild discomfort.

In many ways, this 10-minute exercise says more about teaching identity than a two-hour lecture on methodology.


Why This Matters for Teachers

In classrooms, we constantly ask learners to:

  • take risks
  • speak imperfectly
  • perform in front of others
  • suspend disbelief
  • imagine

If we cannot tolerate mild vulnerability ourselves, what message are we sending?

The Owl Transformation surfaces this tension gently, playfully, safely.

And that’s the power of performative pedagogy.


This Is the Kind of Work We Explore

Activities like this are not icebreakers.

They are diagnostic.

They reveal beliefs, habits, and hidden narratives about creativity and professionalism.

If this resonates, you’re warmly invited to join our free Performative ELT community.

It’s a space where teachers explore:

  • embodied approaches to teaching
  • facilitation as presence
  • imagination in professional identity
  • practical activities like this one (with reflection and theory behind them)

You can join us here:

👉 https://performativeelt.com/free-community-6779

Because sometimes, the path to becoming a more present, confident facilitator begins with one simple question:

Can you become an owl without laughing?

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Every Time You Give Feedback, You Choose Control or Trust

Feedback Isn’t Neutral: What Every Facilitator Is Really Choosing

Feedback feels like the responsible thing to do.

Learners expect it.
Institutions demand it.
Teachers are trained to provide it.

But feedback is never just feedback.

Every time a facilitator responds to learner work, they are making a deeper decision—often without realising it.

A decision about control, trust, and whose voice matters.


Before “how”, there’s a more important question

Before deciding how to give feedback, facilitators need to pause and ask:

What is this feedback actually for?

Common purposes include:

  • improving accuracy
  • helping learners notice gaps
  • encouraging reflection
  • building independence
  • meeting learner expectations

None of these are wrong.

Problems arise when these purposes conflict—or when they remain unexamined.


The trade-offs we don’t talk about

Teacher feedback offers real advantages:

  • clarity
  • efficiency
  • reassurance

But it also comes with costs:

  • learners may become dependent
  • attention narrows to correctness
  • learners slip into passive roles

Facilitation doesn’t reject teacher feedback.

It treats it as powerful—and therefore dangerous if overused.


Why peer feedback so often fails

Peer feedback is frequently described as “learner-centred”.

In practice, when it’s poorly facilitated, it can:

  • feel superficial
  • create discomfort
  • spread misinformation

The issue isn’t peer feedback.

It’s the assumption that learners already know how to do it.

Effective peer feedback requires:

  • clear criteria or guiding questions
  • modelling by the facilitator
  • a psychologically safe climate
  • explicit training and repeated practice

Peer feedback isn’t a shortcut.

It’s a skill learners must learn.


The real tension beneath feedback

At its core, feedback forces facilitators to negotiate a deeper tension:

  • control vs trust
  • certainty vs emergence
  • authority vs agency

Every feedback choice answers the question:

Do I step in—or do I step back?

Facilitation lives in this tension.


Feedback is not a technique. It’s a judgment.

There is no universally “best” feedback approach.

Facilitation involves:

  • reading the group
  • sensing the moment
  • choosing the response that best supports learning now

This judgment can’t be scripted.

It develops through:

  • reflection
  • experimentation
  • discomfort
  • self-awareness

When feedback builds community

Well-facilitated feedback does more than improve performance.

It:

  • normalises imperfection
  • values process as much as product
  • strengthens collective responsibility

It communicates not just what matters—but how we learn together.


By the time feedback happens, it’s already too late

By the moment feedback is given, facilitation has already shaped:

  • who spoke
  • how safe it felt to speak
  • how learning is interpreted

Feedback doesn’t stand alone.

It completes a facilitation arc that began long before anyone spoke.


A final reflection

  • Where do you feel the strongest pull between control and trust?
  • Which feedback habits feel hardest to let go of?
  • What kind of facilitator are your feedback choices shaping you into?

Facilitation is never finished.

It’s refined through noticing, reflecting, experimenting—and listening, not only to learners, but to oneself.

The most effective facilitators aren’t those with the most techniques.

They’re the ones with the clearest judgment and deepest presence.

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What You Do While Learners Are Talking Matters More Than What You Say

What Do You Do While Learners Are Talking?

The hidden craft of facilitating discussion

Facilitation doesn’t reveal itself in the lesson plan.

It reveals itself after the activity has started.

Once learners begin speaking freely—really speaking—the facilitator faces a very different challenge:

What do I do now?
Do I step in?
Do I correct?
Do I wait?

This is the moment where facilitation stops being theoretical and becomes visible.


Discussion is not a task. It’s an event.

Free discussion is unpredictable by nature.
Once learners start talking, outcomes can’t be fully planned or controlled.

From a facilitation perspective, discussion is:

  • emergent, not scripted
  • social, not individual
  • shaped moment by moment, not line by line

This unpredictability is exactly what makes discussion pedagogically powerful.

And exactly what makes it uncomfortable.


The hardest facilitation skill? Doing nothing.

During discussion, many facilitators feel an almost physical urge to intervene.

To:

  • correct language immediately
  • redirect ideas
  • summarise too early
  • fill silence

But effective facilitation doesn’t start with speaking.

It starts with watching.

Skilled facilitators attend to:

  • who is speaking—and who isn’t
  • how turns are taken
  • shifts in energy and engagement
  • moments of hesitation, excitement, or withdrawal

This observational stance isn’t passive.
It’s what makes principled feedback possible later.


The real question isn’t “Can I give feedback?”

It’s:

Why would I give feedback now?

After free discussion, feedback can serve many purposes:

  • helping learners notice effective communication
  • reinforcing confidence and risk-taking
  • drawing attention to interaction strategies
  • addressing patterns that genuinely matter

Facilitation is the art of choice.
Not everything you notice needs to be said.


Feedback should continue the discussion—not end it

Poorly handled feedback can:

  • shut down participation
  • recentre the teacher
  • turn discussion into evaluation

Well-facilitated feedback does the opposite. It:

  • extends learning
  • keeps learner voice central
  • validates participation rather than punishing it

One powerful move is to begin with learners’ perceptions:

  • What did you notice about the discussion?
  • What helped it keep going?
  • Where did communication break down?

Now feedback becomes shared inquiry, not judgement.


Five lenses facilitators can choose from

Feedback doesn’t have to mean “language correction”.

It can focus on different lenses:

  • Content – ideas, opinions, experiences
  • Interaction – turn-taking, listening, responding
  • Language – accuracy, range, pronunciation
  • Strategy – how learners managed the discussion
  • Affective factors – confidence, engagement, risk

The facilitation question is always the same:

Which lens best serves learning right now?


Why over-feedback kills discussion

One of the most common facilitation mistakes is saying too much.

When everything is commented on:

  • learners struggle to prioritise
  • confidence drops
  • discussion becomes performative rather than exploratory

Selective feedback isn’t withholding.

It’s protective.


Why this matters more than we admit

Discussion is one of the few classroom moments where:

  • learners experience real agency
  • meaning is negotiated socially
  • learning feels alive

How facilitators respond afterwards determines whether learners experience discussion as:

  • a space for growth
  • or a space for exposure

That difference shapes participation far beyond a single lesson.


A final reflection for facilitators

  • What do you notice first during discussion?
  • What do you feel compelled to comment on—and why?
  • How might selective feedback support confidence rather than control?
  • What would change if feedback were treated as part of the discussion itself?

Facilitation isn’t about saying the right thing.

Sometimes, it’s about knowing when not to speak.

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Every Time a Learner Speaks, They Take a Risk

Participation isn’t about confidence or motivation.
It’s about how much risk the learning space asks learners to carry.

Participation Isn’t About Confidence.
It’s About Risk.

Facilitation isn’t just about getting more people to speak.
It’s about how much risk speaking feels like.

Every time a learner contributes, they risk being:
misunderstood, judged, wrong, or ignored.

How we structure interaction determines whether that risk feels manageable — or overwhelming.


Participation always carries risk

Speaking in a learning space is never neutral.
It involves:

  • social exposure
  • cognitive effort
  • emotional vulnerability

Some learners find this energising.
Others find it threatening.

Facilitators can’t remove risk — but they can shape how it’s experienced.


Think–Pair–Share isn’t a technique. It’s risk management.

Think–Pair–Share works because it sequences visibility:

  • Think → private processing
  • Pair → rehearsal and support
  • Share → public contribution

Seen this way, it’s not a discussion activity.
It’s a way of protecting learners before asking them to be visible.

When sequencing is skipped:

  • confident voices dominate
  • hesitant learners withdraw
  • silence becomes uncomfortable

Sequencing widens access to voice without forcing it.


Open vs closed interaction (and why both matter)

Open interaction

  • spontaneous
  • unpredictable
  • high ownership
  • high risk

Closed interaction

  • guided turns
  • clearer expectations
  • lower risk
  • less spontaneity

Neither is “better”.

Facilitation is about asking:
Which structure serves this group, right now, for this purpose?

Skilled facilitators move between them — they don’t default.


Role play: powerful, risky, misunderstood

Role play can:

  • increase authenticity
  • allow experimentation with identity
  • shift risk from self to role

But without careful facilitation, it can feel exposing or threatening.

What makes the difference?

  • clear framing
  • optional participation routes
  • preparation time
  • reflective debriefing

Structure turns risk into play.


Talking Circles: redistributing voice

Talking Circles deliberately slow interaction and equalise speaking rights.

They:

  • protect quieter voices
  • foreground listening
  • reduce dominance

But only when silence is respected and participation isn’t coerced.

Equality of voice has to be held, not enforced.


This is an ethical issue, not a technical one

When we structure interaction, we decide:

  • whose risks are supported
  • whose voices are heard
  • whose silence is respected

Too much safety leads to passivity.
Too much risk leads to withdrawal.

Facilitation lives in the tension between the two.


A question to take into your next lesson 👇
Are you inviting participation — or managing risk?

(Adapted from Chapter 5 of my Facilitation Skills handbook.)

Posted in Teacher Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Importance of First Impressions in Facilitation

The First Five Minutes Matter More Than You Think

The first five minutes of a lesson, workshop, or course often do more pedagogical work than the next fifty.

Before learners engage with content or objectives, they encounter something more immediate:

the climate of the space.

This chapter of my Facilitation Skills handbook explores a simple but often overlooked idea:
facilitation begins before teaching.


Beginnings are not neutral

Ice breakers and warmers are often treated as optional extras — something to “get things going.”

From a facilitation perspective, this underestimates their power.

Beginnings quietly:

  • establish norms for participation
  • signal who is expected to speak
  • shape perceptions of safety and risk
  • influence who contributes later — and who stays silent

Facilitation starts the moment people enter the room.


Ice breakers aren’t about fun — they’re about positioning

Good ice breakers don’t entertain.
They position learners.

They position:

  • learners in relation to each other
  • learners in relation to the facilitator
  • learners in relation to voice and risk

Take a simple activity like Find Someone Who.
On the surface, it looks light and social.
Underneath, it:

  • invites personal disclosure without overexposure
  • equalises participation
  • creates immediate peer connection
  • shifts attention away from the teacher

That’s facilitation at work.


When ice breakers go wrong

Ice breakers usually fail not because learners are resistant, but because:

  • too much disclosure is demanded too soon
  • the purpose is unclear
  • the process is rushed
  • participation becomes uneven or exposed

Poorly facilitated openings can increase anxiety and reinforce silence.

Facilitation isn’t about doing an activity.
It’s about holding a process.


Warmers ≠ Ice breakers

Although we often use the terms interchangeably, facilitation benefits from distinguishing them.

  • Ice breakers build safety, trust, and connection
  • Warmers build energy, focus, and readiness

An energetic warmer without safety can still exclude.
A safe ice breaker without momentum can stall.

Skilled facilitators choose intentionally.


“Getting to know you” is pedagogical

Opening activities don’t just build rapport — they provide vital information.

They show us:

  • who speaks easily
  • who hesitates
  • who dominates
  • who withdraws

This is diagnostic data.
And it should shape how we facilitate everything that follows.


Presence at the beginning

Facilitation at the start of a session requires:

  • attentiveness
  • restraint
  • responsiveness

The facilitator’s job isn’t to perform confidence, but to contain uncertainty — both theirs and the group’s.

That’s why beginnings feel risky.
They reveal dynamics before control is established.


Why this matters later

The climate created at the beginning affects:

  • participation in discussion
  • willingness to give peer feedback
  • tolerance of ambiguity
  • how silence is experienced

Facilitation is cumulative.
What happens later depends on what was made possible earlier.


Reflection 👇
What do your lesson openings communicate — not about content, but about participation?

Posted in Teacher Development, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Warmers and Ice Breakers

A mingling activity like ‘find someone who’ is an example of an effective warmer activity. And basically there are three stages. There’s the setting up stage where the instructions need to be clear. And you notice that the facilitator was eliciting the instructions and providing examples at each stage. Then there is the task itself where the people stand up and mill around asking each other questions and interacting. And then there is the feedback stage where the facilitator asks for reporting back on what was discovered. So I think the advantages of these kind of activities is that it helps participants gain confidence. They feel relaxed. They start interacting, they start speaking in English, if it’s a language classroom, but even if it’s a training session or a meeting, it gets them going, it sort of activates them.

It gives the facilitator or trainer an opportunity to diagnose the participants, see who they are, what do they know, what are their attitudes. If it’s a classroom, their level of English. it also gets participants to get to know each other as well as the trainer or facilitator. It’s a process of beginning to build a rapport and beginning to encourage self-disclosure. It sets the atmosphere for the course. It kind of says, okay, this is the way we’re going to interact. This is the way the learning is going to happen. And it’s an energizer. It gets people active and participating.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment